Vision

MRF

Melbourne Rapid Fields research

Research Publications & Awards

Melbourne Rapid Fields has been evaluated across glaucoma, macular disease and neurological visual-field assessment, including clinic, home-monitoring, telemedicine, rural screening and bedside settings. The reference table below has been updated from the July 2026 scientific publication list and can be sorted by date, independent-study status, disease area and testing environment.

36references listed
12independent research-group publications
3major clinical areas: glaucoma, macular disease, neurology
Home + clinicevidence across real-world environments

Prizes and awards

2025

InnovationAus Awards finalist

Finalist in the Health Tech category, recognising the impact of MRF in accessible eye-health technology.

2016 & 2018

ARVO “Hot Topic” selections

Nominated and awarded as a Hot Topic at ARVO, a distinction reserved for a small proportion of submissions.

Nov 2017

MACH Translation first prize

Melbourne Academic Health Care Translation first prize with $20,000 support for startup development.

Feb 2017

Asia-ARVO translational prize

Awarded Prize for Translational Development of a novel vision test at the Asia-ARVO meeting, Brisbane.

2016

MedTech Got Talent finalist

Finalist in the Victorian Government MedTech Got Talent technology competition.

2015

AMP Tomorrow Maker Award

Early support recognising the promise of MRF technology for improving access to visual-field testing.

Sortable reference table

Click any column heading to sort. Use the search box and filters to quickly find independent studies, disease groups or testing environments.

DateIndependent study?Disease conditionClinic/home environmentStudy typeReference
2026 Yes Glaucoma Systematic review / meta-analysis Independent study Perimetric outcomes of Melbourne Rapid Field perimetry in patients with glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Inzunza A, Moreno-Diaz EA, Goss D, Friedman DS. J Glaucoma. 2026;35(7):464-472. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002723
2026 Yes Neurology / geriatric vision screening Orthogeriatric rehabilitation Independent study Visual screening in an orthogeriatric rehabilitation setting: a feasibility evaluation
Yan MCK, Farid S, Chillala J, Harper RA. Innovation in Aging. 2026;10(5):igag022. doi:10.1093/geroni/igag022
2026 Yes Glaucoma Telemedicine / rural Independent study Patient preferences for portable versus table-mounted visual field devices in rural Alabama: a mixed methods study within a telemedicine setting
Antwi-Adjei EK, Datta S, Girkin CA, Owsley C, Rhodes LA, Fifolt M, Racette L. medRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.04.23.26351565
2026 Yes Glaucoma Telemedicine / underserved areas Independent study Comparative analysis of visual field test results using tablet-based and table-mounted devices in a telemedicine program set in underserved areas
Antwi-Adjei EK, Swain TA, Girkin CA, Owsley C, Rhodes LA, Racette L. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2026;15(3):29. doi:10.1167/tvst.15.3.29
2026 No Glaucoma Home Clinical trial Fields from home: device-independent online perimetry with Melbourne Rapid Fields
Montesano G, Nathwani N, Yu J, Kong YXG, Vingrys A, Gazzard G, Jayaram H. Br J Ophthalmol. 2026. doi:10.1136/bjo-2025-328016
2026 Yes Glaucoma Commentary / clinical promise Independent commentary The Melbourne Rapid Field test: usability and clinical promise
Ichhpujani P. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2026;74:595-596. doi:10.4103/IJO.IJO_2737_25
2025 No Glaucoma Clinic Clinical trial Comparison of 30-2 visual field using Melbourne Rapid Fields online perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer
Sugihara K, Kong YXG, Hosokawa M, Okanouchi T. J Glaucoma. 2025 Sep 10.
2025 No Macular / Glaucoma Clinic Clinical trial Comparison of 10-2 visual field using Melbourne Rapid Fields online perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer
Sugihara K, Kong YXG, Hosokawa M, Okanouchi T. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025;14(9):14. doi:10.1167/tvst.14.9.14
2025 No Glaucoma Clinic Clinical trial Comparative analysis of Melbourne Rapid Fields web-browser perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Chinese glaucoma patients
Chen D-F, Zhou W, Lu X, Wang T, Wang C, Wang Y, Kong YXG, Vingrys AJ, Ye C, Liang Y. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025.
2025 No Glaucoma Multi-centre clinic Clinical trial Multi-centre comparison between device-independent web-browser perimetry (Melbourne Rapid Fields-web) and SITA-Faster for glaucoma
Tiang J, Vingrys AJ, Lin S, Prea SM, Moktar AA, Bank A, Agar A, Kong GYX. Front Ophthalmol. 2025;5. doi:10.3389/fopht.2025.1485950
2025 No Glaucoma Clinic Clinical trial Acceptance of innovative perimetry methods in Germany: virtual reality glasses perimetry and tablet-based perimetry in glaucoma patients
Schrittenlocher SA, Lüke V, Irle H, Weliwitage J, Lüke JN, Kong GYX, Vingrys AJ, Lappas A, Cursiefen C, Dietlein TS. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2025 Jan 7.
2025 No Glaucoma Daily clinical practice / clinic Clinical trial Portable perimetry devices for glaucoma patients - practicality in daily clinical practice and glaucoma expert assessment
Schrittenlocher S, Lüke V, Irle H, Weliwitage J, Lüke JN, Enders P, Hoffmann E, Rosentreter A, Lübke J, et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00417-025-07028-9
2025 No Neurology Clinical follow-up Clinical trial Persistent visual impairments following mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke
Wijesundera C, Crewther SG, Wijeratne T, Vingrys AJ. Front Ophthalmol. 2025;5. doi:10.3389/fopht.2025.1505836
2024 No Glaucoma Clinic / paediatric Clinical trial Measuring visual fields in children with glaucoma using a portable tablet
Gupta V, Kong GYX, Singh A, Panigrahi A, Gupta S, Prea S, Vingrys AJ. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024.
2024 Yes Mixed: neurology, optic nerve, glaucoma, unexplained vision loss Emergency department User/clinician experience Testing 3 new visual field devices in an emergency department setting
Jain N, Ong E, Li J, Cheng J. Optometry Connection. 2024 Mar:32-35.
2023 Yes Glaucoma Clinic / patient experience Independent study Participant experience using novel perimetry tests to monitor glaucoma progression
Freeman SE, De Arrigunaga S, Kang J, Zhao Y, Roldan AM, Lin MM, Elze T, Liebman D, Chang DS, Friedman DS. J Glaucoma. 2023;32(11):948-953.
2023 No Macular / AMD Home Clinical trial Performance of a smart device over 12 months for home monitoring of patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration
Prea SM, Guymer RH, Kong GY, Vingrys AJ. J Clin Med. 2023;12(2530). doi:10.3390/jcm12072530
2023 Yes Glaucoma Clinic Independent study Comparison of perimetric outcomes from a tablet perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer
Kang J, De Arrigunaga S, Freeman SE, Zhao Y, Lin M, Liebman DL, Roldan AM, Kim JA, Chang DS, et al. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2023.03.001
2022 No Glaucoma Home / telemedicine Clinical trial Test reliability and compliance to a twelve-month visual field telemedicine study in glaucoma patients
Prea SM, Vingrys AJ, Kong GYX. J Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4317. doi:10.3390/jcm11154317
2022 Yes Glaucoma Clinic screening Independent study Glaucoma screening using an iPad-based visual field test in a West African population
Prince J, Thompson A, Mwanza JC, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Budenz DL. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022;5(3):275-283. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2021.09.002
2022 Yes Validation Clinic / laboratory Independent study Evaluation of the Melbourne Rapid Fields test procedure
Harris PA, Johnson CA, Chen Y, Fann H, Gafford G, Kim YJ, et al. Optom Vis Sci. 2022;99(4):372-382. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001889
2022 No Neurology Hospital / acute stroke Clinical trial Vision and visuomotor performance following acute ischemic stroke
Wijesundera C, Crewther SG, Wijeratne T, Vingrys AJ. Front Neurol. 2022;13:757431. doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.757431
2022 No Macular / AMD Home and clinic Clinical trial Short-term compliance and concordance to in-clinic testing for tablet-based home monitoring in age-related macular degeneration
Prea SM, Kong GYX, Guymer RH, Sharangan P, Baglin EK, Vingrys AJ. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;235:280-290. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2021.09.003
2022 Yes Diabetic eye disease / Glaucoma Clinic screening Independent study Diagnostic accuracies of smartphone-based fundus photography and tablet-based visual field testing
Tecson PAS, Caparas VJL, Covar RVA. Philipp J Ophthalmol. 2022;47:82-86.
2021 No Validation Clinic / psychophysics Clinical science Scaling the size of perimetric stimuli reduces variability and returns constant thresholds across the visual field
Bedggood PA, Prea SM, Kong GYX, Vingrys AJ. J Vis. 2021;21(11):2. doi:10.1167/jov.21.11.2
2021 No Glaucoma Rural screening / clinic Clinical trial Screening for glaucomatous visual field defects in rural Australia with an iPad
Chia MA, Trang E, Agar A, Vingrys AJ, Hepschke J, Kong GYX, Turner AW. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2021;15(3):125-131. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1312
2021 No Glaucoma / Macular Home / survey User experience Survey of long-term home monitoring of visual field in patients with chronic eye disease
Prea S, Kong YXG, Vingrys AJ, Baglin EK, Sivarajah P, Guymer RH. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(8):521.
2021 No Glaucoma Home Clinical trial Uptake, persistence, and performance of weekly home monitoring of visual field in a large cohort of patients with glaucoma
Prea SM, Kong GYX, Guymer RH, Vingrys AJ. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;223:286-295. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.10.023
2020 No Neurology Hospital / acute stroke Clinical trial Acquired visual deficits independent of lesion site in acute stroke
Wijesundera C, Vingrys AJ, Wijeratne T, Crewther SG. Front Neurol. 2020;11:705. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00705
2020 Yes Glaucoma Clinic Independent study Comparison of perimetric outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields tablet perimeter software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in glaucoma patients
Kumar H, Thulasidas M. J Ophthalmol. 2020:8384509. doi:10.1155/2020/8384509
2018 Yes Glaucoma Clinic Independent study Performance of iPad-based threshold perimetry in glaucoma and controls
Schulz AM, Graham EC, You Y, Klistorner A, Graham SL. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46(4):346-355. doi:10.1111/ceo.13082
2018 No Glaucoma Clinic / longitudinal Clinical trial Six-month longitudinal comparison of a portable tablet perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyser
Prea SM, Kong GYX, Mehta A, He M, Crowston JG, Gupta V, Martin KR, Vingrys AJ. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;190:9-16. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.009
2017 No Glaucoma Home monitoring / modelling Clinical science Can home monitoring allow earlier detection of rapid visual field progression in glaucoma?
Anderson AJ, Bedggood PA, Kong GYX, Martin KR, Vingrys AJ. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1735-1742. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.06.028
2017 No Neurology Bedside / hospital Clinical trial Tablets at the bedside - iPad-based visual field test used in the diagnosis of intrasellar haemangiopericytoma: a case report
Nesaratnam N, Thomas PBM, Kirollos R, Vingrys AJ, Kong GYX, Martin KR. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):53. doi:10.1186/s12886-017-0445-z
2016 No Glaucoma Clinic Clinical trial Comparison of perimetric results from a tablet perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in glaucoma patients
Kong GYX, He M, Crowston JG, Vingrys AJ. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5(6):2. doi:10.1167/tvst.5.6.2
2016 No Validation Clinic / bench validation Clinical science Validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter
Vingrys AJ, Healey JK, Liew S, Saharinen V, Tran M, Wu W, Kong GYX. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5(4):4. doi:10.1167/tvst.5.4.4

Independent-study status is based on the “clinical trials of the MRF application reported by independent research groups” section in the supplied publication list. Items not in that section are shown as MRF team/collaborator studies.